Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 12% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-10900F - 139 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 28 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i7-14700K - €288.88 vs €807.63
- Up to 60% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-14700K - €2.33 vs €5.81 per FPS
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
139
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.81/FPS
40%
Price, €
€807.63
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for €807.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 116 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
89%
Value, €/FPS
€2.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€288.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-14700K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
20 | Cores | 10 |
28 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |