Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 880 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 19% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-10400F - 136 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - €143.11 vs €458.99
- Up to 63% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i7-13700K - €1.26 vs €3.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.37/FPS
37%
Price, €
€458.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €458.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
114
83%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€143.11
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €143.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 241 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |