Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-10300 - 215 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €139.45 vs €382.0
- Up to 59% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-13700F - €0.73 vs €1.78 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €382 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
191
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€139.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €139.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 125 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |