Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 2094 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 20% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 1600X - 152 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €74.44 vs €343.68
- Up to 74% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-13700F - €0.59 vs €2.26 per FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.26/FPS
26.10619469026549%
Price, €
€343.68
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €343.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
127
83.55263157894737%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
42.2021796317174%
Multi-Core
4766
30.79806138933764%
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |