Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 73% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than FX-6300 - 102 vs 59 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €49.68 vs €348.75
- Up to 75% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i7-13700F - €0.84 vs €3.42 per FPS
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
102
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.42/FPS
24.561403508771928%
Price, €
€348.75
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €348.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3727 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
59
57.84313725490197%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3716 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |