Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700 is 3725 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700
- Performs up to 108% better in F1 23 than FX-6300 - 308 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i7-13700 - €38.99 vs €397.8
- Up to 80% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-13700 - €0.26 vs €1.29 per FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €397.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |