Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4690S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 2805 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 30% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-4690S - 682 vs 523 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690S - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - €70.78 vs €280.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-12700F - €0.14 vs €0.41 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 458 minutes ago
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
523
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.14/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.78
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 457 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | Intel Core i5-4690S |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |