Buy on Amazon
€252.32
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700K is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700K
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10320 - 145 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i7-11700K - €151.33 vs €252.32
- Up to 35% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i7-11700K - €1.13 vs €1.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-11700K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
145
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.74/FPS
64%
Price, €
€252.32
59%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i7-11700K processore desktop di 11a generazione (frequenza di base: 3,6 GHz. Tuboost: 4,9 GHz, 8 core, LGA1200) BX8070811700 K
Buy for €252.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10320 (fase base: 3,80 GHZ; attacco: LGA1200; 65 Watt) Box, BX8070110320
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-11700K
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700K | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 36.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
