Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 1079 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-8100T - 448 vs 399 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - €199.59 vs €290.96
- Up to 23% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-11700F - €0.5 vs €0.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
448
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
76%
Price, €
€290.96
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for €290.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12836 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
399
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €199.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12836 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |