Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4150 - 192 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - €39.9 vs €294.9
- Up to 84% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-11700F - €0.24 vs €1.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
15%
Price, €
€294.9
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €294.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
Buy for €39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |