Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 320 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i3-10320 - 375 vs 353 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 49% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - €151.33 vs €294.62
- Up to 46% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-11700F - €0.43 vs €0.79 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
375
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
54%
Price, €
€294.62
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €294.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
353
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.33
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €151.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 148 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11700F | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |