Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-10870H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 140 days older than Core i7-10870H.
Advantages of Core i7-10870H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i7-10870H - 257 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10870H - 20 vs 16 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i7-10870H
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10870H | vs | Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 10 |
| 16 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
