Buy on Amazon
€258.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $249
Availability
MSRP in USD: $249
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 1115 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Fortnite than Ryzen 5 1600X - 230 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 11% cheaper than Core i7-10700KF - €231.18 vs €258.88
- Up to 8% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i7-10700KF - €1.04 vs €1.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
92%
Price, €
€258.88
89%
FPS Winner
Processore Intel® Core™ i7-10700KF per sistemi desktop 8 core fino a 5,1 GHz sbloccato senza grafica del processore LGA1200 (chipset Intel® serie 400) 125 W
Buy for €258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
222
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.04/FPS
100%
Price, €
€231.18
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X Processoro da 3.6GHz, 64bit, Socket AM4, 14 nm, Cores 6, Threads 12, TDP 95W
Buy for €231.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i7-10700KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 5 1600X
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
