Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Rocket League than Core i3-7100 - 732 vs 708 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - €144.68 vs €271.99
- Up to 46% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-10700K - €0.2 vs €0.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
732
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.37/FPS
54%
Price, €
€271.99
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €271.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
708
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€144.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €144.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |