Buy on Amazon
€278.88
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4150 - 280 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - €33.4 vs €278.88
- Up to 88% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-10700K - €0.12 vs €1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 54 vs 125 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core i7-10700K
Buy for €278.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7445 minutes ago
Intel BX80646I34150 Core i3-4150 Processore, 3M Cache, 3.50 GHz, FC-LGA12C, Boxed
Buy for €33.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7445 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-10700K
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
