Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 3600 - 181 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - €85.0 vs €272.66
- Up to 69% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i7-10700K - €0.47 vs €1.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 65 vs 125 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
31%
Price, €
€272.66
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11303 minutes ago
Buy for €85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11303 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |