Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6300 - 193 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - €38.99 vs €278.88
- Up to 84% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-10700K - €0.23 vs €1.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
15%
Price, €
€278.88
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for €278.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700K | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |