Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 373 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Core i3-9100F - 204 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - €128.88 vs €271.25
- Up to 52% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-10700F - €0.64 vs €1.33 per FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.33/FPS
48%
Price, €
€271.25
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for €271.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
200
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€128.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |