Buy on Amazon
€255.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7840HS is 1001 days newer than Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Core i7-10700F - 287 vs 279 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
279
97.21254355400697%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.66
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-10700F processor 2.9 GHz 16 MB Smart Cache Box
Buy for €255.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61757 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 7 7840HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1612
67.50418760469012%
Multi-Core
7231
64.62019660411082%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 16 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i7-10700F or Ryzen 7 7840HS
F1 22, 1920 x 1080, Ultra High
29 FPS
€25.14/FPS
GeForce GT 710
Core i7-10700F
32 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
€729
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.