Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 8% better in Rocket League than FX-6300 - 725 vs 673 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - €49.68 vs €312.66
- Up to 84% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-10700 - €0.07 vs €0.43 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
725
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
16.27906976744186%
Price, €
€312.66
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €312.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
673
92.82758620689656%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.68
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |