Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1457 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9600KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - €258.88 vs €544.99
- Up to 49% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-13900 - €0.48 vs €0.94 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Tanks than Core i5-9600KF - 581 vs 539 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
539
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.48/FPS
100%
Price, €
€258.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Buy for €544.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |