Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-8100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 281 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-8100T - 132 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - €199.59 vs €258.88
- Up to 16% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-9600KF - €1.65 vs €1.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
132
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.96/FPS
84%
Price, €
€258.88
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for €258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12834 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
121
91%
Value, €/FPS
€1.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €199.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12835 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600KF | vs | Intel Core i3-8100T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |