Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-9400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 1457 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Up to 64% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - €158.88 vs €438.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - €0.91 vs €2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-9400F - 207 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
175
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
Buy for €438 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |