Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i5-9400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 546 days newer than Core i5-9400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 3% better in Rocket League than Core i5-9400F - 733 vs 715 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 24 vs 6 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €142.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 260 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Single-Core
1378
79.69924812030075%
Multi-Core
4834
48.195413758723824%
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |