Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 765 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 4% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-6100 - 253 vs 243 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-8600K - €168.88 vs €288.88
- Up to 39% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i5-8600K - €0.69 vs €1.14 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €288.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18518 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
243
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€168.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18518 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8600K | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |