Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 2107 days newer than Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 30% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-8400T - 131 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€300
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €300 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1099
40.91586001489203%
Multi-Core
3884
27.284861257463998%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |