Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €188.88 vs €484.66
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-13900F - €0.93 vs €2.14 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-8400 - 227 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 32 vs 6 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
204
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
227
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.14/FPS
43%
Price, €
€484.66
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €484.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8400 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |