Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8305G outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8305G is 2304 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8305G
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-4100 - 168 vs 150 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65994 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-8305G | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake G | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel BGA 2270 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon RX Vega M GL | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |