Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3894 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €19.99 vs €114.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-11400F - €0.11 vs €0.5 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 28% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-760 - 227 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 12 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
178
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
Buy for €114 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 157 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |