Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3894 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - €19.99 vs €120.64
- Up to 83% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-10105 - €0.12 vs €0.69 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i5-760 - 175 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
167
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
175
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
17%
Price, €
€120.64
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €120.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |