Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3412 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 76% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €19.99 vs €81.91
- Up to 75% better value when playing Minecraft than Athlon 3000G - €0.03 vs €0.12 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 10% better in Minecraft than Core i5-760 - 656 vs 599 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
FPS
599
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Buy for €81.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Athlon |
Lynnfield | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |