Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1764 days newer than Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 14% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-6600T - 603 vs 530 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 20 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
603
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€408.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €408.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1181
66.98808848553603%
Multi-Core
3223
35.20865195542932%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |