Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600T outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600T is 941 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G1610 - 133 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
127
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |