Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1758 days newer than Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 4% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-6600T - 124 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 8 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i5-6600T
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-6600T
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Single-Core
1181
70.7185628742515%
Multi-Core
3223
55.636112549628855%
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
