Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 1022 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 4% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 2600 - 175 vs 168 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i5-6600K - €89.47 vs €188.88
- Up to 54% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-6600K - €0.5 vs €1.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 12 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
168
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.47
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €89.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Skylake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |