Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2793 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-650.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-650
- Up to 61% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €148.8 vs €379.64
- Up to 60% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.79 vs €2.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 73 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than Core i5-650 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-650 - 16 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €148.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3447 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
190
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2/FPS
39%
Price, €
€379.64
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-650 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Clarkdale | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |