Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100F is 2399 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-6400 - 122 vs 102 FPS
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - €97.0 vs €258.88
- Up to 69% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-6400 - €0.8 vs €2.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13083 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
122
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13082 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |