Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2378 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 12% better in Rust than Core i5-6400 - 204 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-6400 - €78.8 vs €258.88
- Up to 73% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-6400 - €0.39 vs €1.42 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18258 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€78.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €78.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18257 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6400 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |