Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 157 days older than Xeon E3-1270 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 0% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 255 vs 254 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i5-5675C
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Xeon E3-1270 v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2015 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 80 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
