Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 1311 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than FX-8120 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 8 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-5675C
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675C | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i5 | Collection | FX |
| Broadwell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
