Buy on Amazon
€75.43
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $315
Availability
MSRP in USD: $315
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Core i5-5250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 1145 days newer than Core i5-5250U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5250U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 15 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 8% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-5250U - 124 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5250U - 16 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Wraith Prism LED RGB Ventola di raffreddamento del processore Ryzen 7 2700X AM4/AM2/AM3/AM3+Connettore a 4 pin Base in rame/Dissipatore di calore in alluminio, Computer desktop
Buy for €75.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15740 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-5250U
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Ryzen 7 2700X
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5250U | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 6000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
