Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - €108.66 vs €200.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4690 - 132 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €108.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74430 minutes ago
Buy for €200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74430 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1191
82.82336578581364%
Multi-Core
3303
57.43348982785602%
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |