Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i5-4690 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 2266 days newer than Core i5-4690.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 84 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 11% better in Rust than Core i5-4690 - 206 vs 186 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690 - 64 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
186
90.29126213592234%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€108.66
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €108.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1191
71.96374622356495%
Multi-Core
3303
22.655874888538307%
Intel Core i5-4690 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 32 |
4 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |