Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2524 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - €186.88 vs €763.04
- Up to 73% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900K - €1.11 vs €4.17 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 84 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4670 - 183 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 20 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
169
92.34972677595628%
Value, €/FPS
€1.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€186.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €186.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1599 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
183
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.17/FPS
26.618705035971225%
Price, €
€763.04
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €763.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1605 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1172
67.00971983990853%
Multi-Core
3228
35.22863690930918%
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |