Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1782 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 37% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - €138.88 vs €219.99
- Up to 36% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 5 2600X - €1.35 vs €2.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-4670 - 104 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
103
99%
Value, €/FPS
€1.35/FPS
100%
Price, €
€138.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
104
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
63%
Price, €
€219.99
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €219.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |