Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i5-4590T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 898 days newer than Core i5-4590T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590T
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 35 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i5-4590T - 123 vs 117 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590T - 44 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i5-4590T
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4590T
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Single-Core
916
77.95744680851064%
Multi-Core
2544
26.44765568146377%
Intel Core i5-4590T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 22 |
| 4 | Threads | 44 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
