Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Core i5-4590T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 2256 days newer than Core i5-4590T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590T
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Core i5-4590T - 203 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590T - 64 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i5-4590T
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-4590T
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Single-Core
916
55.34743202416919%
Multi-Core
2544
17.44975649907401%
Intel Core i5-4590T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
