Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4590 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4590 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4590.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4590
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €35.0 vs €117.5
- Up to 66% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11400F - €0.28 vs €0.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4590 - 142 vs 126 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4590 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4590 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10340 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.83/FPS
33%
Price, €
€117.5
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10339 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4590 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |