Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4570T outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4570T is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570T
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6300 - 132 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i5-4570T - €49.68 vs €137.85
- Up to 62% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-4570T - €0.39 vs €1.04 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570T - 6 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €137.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12673 minutes ago
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4570T | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |