Buy on Amazon
€39.87
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $333
Availability
MSRP in USD: $333
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4440 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4440 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 2060 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4440.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4440
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - €39.87 vs €265.06
- Up to 84% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-9700 - €0.17 vs €1.09 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-4440 - 244 vs 237 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Core i5-4440 - 65 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4440 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4440
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
237
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€39.87
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core Haswell i5-4440 Processore / 3.1 GHz / LGA1150 / 6MB Cache/Boxed
Buy for €39.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11405 minutes ago
Core I7-9700 3.00GHZ
Buy for €265.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4440
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-9700
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4440 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 84 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
